'Ghost List' Revisits The TV, Books And Movies A Critic Wishes He Covered

TERRY GROSS, HOST:

This is FRESH AIR. I'm Terry Gross. The 19th-century abolitionist Frederick Douglass is probably best known for his compelling autobiographies in which he described his experiences as a slave and his escape to freedom.

Our guest, historian David Blight, says there's a lot more people don't know about Douglass's long and remarkable life, like the fact that he was the most photographed person in the 19th century and probably the most well-traveled public figure of his century. Douglass was a passionate writer and powerful orator. And he did plenty of both in the 20 years leading up to the Civil War and for decades after, condemning the restoration of white supremacists in the former slave states and the denial of basic rights to black citizens.

Blight's new biography of Douglass is on The New York Times list of the 10 best books of the year. It illuminates many facets of Douglass's life - his break with leading abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison, his complicated personal life, his support for and bitter feud with leaders of the women's suffrage movement and his years as a Republican Party functionary when he took patronage jobs in the government. David Blight is a professor of history at Yale and the author or editor of a dozen books, including annotated editions of Douglass's first two autobiographies. He spoke with FRESH AIR's Dave Davies about his new book "Frederick Douglass: Prophet Of Freedom."

DAVE DAVIES, BYLINE: Well, David Blight, welcome back to FRESH AIR. Tell us about Frederick Douglass early life. Where was he born? What was his life like as a slave?

DAVID BLIGHT: Well, first, thank you, Dave. It's great to be back on FRESH AIR. Frederick Douglass was born along a horseshoe bend in the Tuckahoe River on the Eastern Shore of Maryland in 1818. It's a - kind of a remote backwater, at that point, of the American slave society. He was born on the Holme Hill Farm, which was owned by his then master Aaron Anthony. His mother was a still young woman named Harriet Bailey. He was probably born in his grandmother Betsy Bailey's cabin, although we don't know for sure.

And he never will know exactly who his father was, although one candidate is Aaron Anthony himself. Douglass was always told that his father was his master or one of his masters. So one of the facts of his youth that everyone should know is that he was, in essence, an orphan. He never knew his father, and he never saw his mother after the age of 6. And he had to practically invent images of her. He had very little memory of her.

So as a child, he's essentially a - not altogether abandoned, but he's left without parents. And then he grows up for 20 years as a slave - about 11 of them on the Eastern Shore, and about nine of those years in Baltimore, which, in fact, the city has everything to do with the fact that he would ever be able to escape.

DAVIES: Right. In Baltimore, he lived among a lot of freed black men - right? - and women.

BLIGHT: That's right. That's right. Baltimore was a great ocean port and a great shipbuilding city. And when - in the year he escaped, 1838, Baltimore had about 130,000 people. It was a big ocean port city. It only had about 3,000 slaves, but it had about 17,000 free blacks. It was a very large, very active, energetic freed black community. And he grows up amidst them as well - especially amidst them. And it's there that he would have met Anna Murray, who became his first wife probably, when he was 18 or 19.

He got involved in three or four different churches. He was involved in a debating society. And he had a relative freedom of movement within the city on its confines. But he also had this visual and emotional and imaginative window on the world with the ocean port - with all the great ships that would come in and out of Baltimore Harbor. And it's there that he discovered his literacy and his eventual genius with words and language. It's there where he first began to cultivate his abilities as an orator and even probably his abilities as a writer.

DAVIES: Right. He was fortunate in that Sophia Auld, who was the wife of his then owner, started teaching him the alphabet. And he built on that and learned to read kind of in an enterprising way with other sources. How did he...

BLIGHT: Yes.

DAVIES: ...Come to escape? Can't have been easy.

BLIGHT: No, it wasn't easy. It was a brave plan. He hatched it with Anna, his fiance at the time, as well as a few other people, clearly, who were in on the planning. He got on a train in late August 1838. And by three train rides and three boat rides across rivers, he ended up in New York City in about 38 hours at the base of Chambers Street right down in the Lower Manhattan on the Hudson River side. It was an extraordinary escape through what one might call the Underground Railroad, but he did this essentially all on his own with Anna's help.

DAVIES: They made their way to Massachusetts. Was it New Bedford? Do I have that right?

BLIGHT: Yes.

DAVIES: OK.

BLIGHT: Yes.

DAVIES: And then...

BLIGHT: The whaling town.

DAVIES: Right. He works and ends up becoming quite an orator at an early age. How did that happen?

BLIGHT: Well, he'd already practiced oratory even while he was a slave. And it gave the young Douglass, the teenager, a source of power - a source of something he was good at. He was good at getting on his feet and just trying to speak. Now, he wasn't well-formed yet by any means. But when he gets to New Bedford, he's 21, 22 and 23 years old. They lived there three years. He worked down in the docks. He worked in a foundry. He did all kinds of odd jobs, but he very quickly joined the local AME Zion Church, a black church.

And within a year or so, they had him preaching. They said, this kid can preach; put him up front. And he then learns to preach from the text, which is, of course, the Protestant tradition. And it's there in that AME Zion Church, as well as a couple public meetings, where he gets discovered, so to speak, by the Massachusetts abolitionists who are disciples of William Lloyd Garrison.

And in the late summer of 1841, they invited this very young man - he's 23 years old - out to Nantucket to a big antislavery convention. And it was there in the athenaeum on Nantucket where he gave his first speech to a room full of abolitionists - a room full of white people. And in essence, he got up and told some of his stories about his youth, about being a slave. And he was a hit - a huge hit. And they hired him to then go out on the road as an itinerant lecturer across New England at first and eventually, within a year or two, all across the Northern states.

DAVIES: He eventually becomes and - establishes several newspapers and for the next 20 years becomes an activist...

BLIGHT: Yes.

DAVIES: ...For abolition. He and William Lloyd Garrison had a collaboration but also a bitter parting. So what triggered the breakup?

BLIGHT: Well, there was a scandal blown up by the Garrisonians alleging that Douglass was having an affair with an English woman named Julia Griffiths, who had come to the states, lived in Rochester, N.Y., with the Douglass family. She lived there for six years. Although after three years, she moved out. The Garrisonians claimed Douglass was having an affair in his own house with Julia, which they vehemently denied. And to this day, no one has proven they actually did have a intimate or sexual relationship. And I, frankly, don't think that one was. What she was is an extremely important friend to Douglass. She was his co-editor on the newspaper. She was his principal fundraiser. She and her sister even purchased the mortgage on Douglass's house, and she was a strong emotional support for Douglass. But that blew up his relationship with Garrison, which was, frankly, never really repaired.

DAVIES: He began a pacifist as Garrison was. How did Frederick Douglass's views about the means to abolish slavery evolve between then and the Civil War?

BLIGHT: Yes. That's a fascinating aspect of his life because he undergoes a kind of ideological, strategic, even intellectual transformation. In the late 1840s, early 1850s, I think it's the first great transformation of his public life. He also had quite a breakdown in this period. He could barely make ends meet for his family.

He's trying to be the self-made man who could not provide, but he embraced, for example, things like the possible uses of violence. And that's in the wake, one must know, of the Fugitive Slave Act, which radicalized a lot of people. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 made everyone complicitous with the returning fugitive slaves to their owners if they could be found. And by the - by 1851, 1852, Douglass is writing editorials with lines such as, why do slave catchers fear having their throats cut? It's because they deserve to have them cut.

He also embraced political parties vehemently. He came to see that if you don't attack the law and you don't find a way to change the power at the base of slavery, you would never destroy it. So he's moving - not only moving away from Garrison. He's moving full force into the politics of antislavery. It's not going to be a smooth ride by any means through the 1850s. But by '51 and '52, he's become a thoroughgoing political abolitionist believing in political parties, believing in political activism.

And I also should say here that this moment - when he does have a real emotional breakdown, he spent days at a time bedridden, even with paralytic limbs, he said. And he couldn't even work on the newspaper. It's also a period in which he wrote some of his greatest works, which has probably been true of lots of great writers, but it is certainly true of Douglass.

DAVIES: As he becomes a celebrated author and speaker, he has a wife, Anna, who never learns to read and write, right? What was that relationship like as far as...

BLIGHT: Well, over time it became very difficult. One has to be honest about it. The man who becomes the most famous African-American writer, orator, intellectual in the world was married to a woman who remained largely illiterate. She did not share his intellectual life or his professional life and almost never traveled with him. And he traveled all the time as an itinerant orator. So it became with time a very traditional marriage. Anna ran the house. She was a brilliant domestic woman. But as a marriage in which she could share his intellectual curiosity and enormous ambition, that was not that kind of marriage.

Douglass never wrote much of anything about Anna. In his 1,200 pages of autobiography there's one mention of his wife Anna, and she's called my wife. He also didn't write much about his children, at least in the autobiographies. We have a lot of letters where we can get at those relationships, but Douglass did not discuss his more personal standing in his life in his many, many pages of autobiography.

DAVIES: David Blight's new biography of Frederick Douglass is called "Prophet Of Freedom." We'll continue our conversation after short break. This is FRESH AIR.

(SOUNDBITE OF SONNY ROLLINS' "SKYLARK")

DAVIES: This is FRESH AIR, and we're speaking with David Blight. He is a professor of history from Yale University. He has a new biography of Frederick Douglass called "Prophet Of Freedom." He would continue to be a great orator throughout his career. He lived until the age of 77. We have no recordings of Frederick Douglass. I imagine...

BLIGHT: No.

DAVIES: ...In all the years you spent working on this, you must have wished you could have heard him. Do you have an idea in your head of what he might have sounded like?

BLIGHT: Well, we know a lot about what he sounded like from the way people described him. He had a deep baritone, we're told. He could modulate it a lot of different ways. There are many, many written descriptions. I have lots of clippings from local newspapers around the country of people describing the first time they saw Douglass or heard Douglass, what he sounded like, what he looked like. So we know a fair amount about that. But we also know a lot about the nature of his rhetoric just from reading it.

He was terrific at this craft of starting out a speech slowly, calmly, you know, restfully, drawing an audience into some kind of situation but nothing flamboyant about it, but then slowly but surely working toward some kind of resolution, some kind of point, some kind of argument, some kind of moral message, and then sometimes in that last part of his speech reaching these exuberant crescendos that would just come out of him in shouts or in roars, people would say.

He had that ability of performance. And he gained that by the simple, you know, power of repetition. But he had a performative way of delivering his oratory that people just flocked to see. In fact, I say in the book at one point that seeing and hearing Douglass became through the course of the 19th century a kind of American wonder of the world. If you came to America, you wanted to see Douglass speak if you could. It was that kind of an event.

DAVIES: Douglass watched the crises over slavery build towards the Civil War. He was prepared to see a war in order to see slavery ended. What was his attitude towards Abraham Lincoln? Did they have a relationship?

BLIGHT: Douglass did have a relationship with Lincoln but not until the war years. Douglass first became aware of Lincoln during the Lincoln-Douglas debates. He followed it in the newspapers, and Douglass was even out in Illinois during one or two of the debates.

DAVIES: And we should note this is not (laughter) Lincoln versus Frederick Douglass.

BLIGHT: No, no, no. Sorry...

DAVIES: ...But Stephen Douglas.

BLIGHT: Stephen Douglas, yeah...

DAVIES: Right.

BLIGHT: ...For the Senate race in 1858. He became intrigued with Lincoln then. Of course two years later, Lincoln runs for president. But their relationship was very testy at first. Douglass was one of Lincoln's most ferocious critics in the first year or year and a half of the war because the war wasn't being made against slavery. And they were even trying to return fugitive slaves. So before they ever met, Douglass had said some of the harshest things any critic of Lincoln had ever said.

DAVIES: But things changed over the course of the war. I guess...

BLIGHT: They did.

DAVIES: ...The Emancipation Proclamation was probably critical there.

BLIGHT: It was absolutely critical. Into 1862, Douglass was still hammering away at Lincoln. At one point, he called him the most powerful slave catcher in the country. But after the preliminary proclamation, September '62, and of course the final proclamation, January of '63, Douglass' tune on Lincoln greatly changed. And then especially with the recruiting of black soldiers in the wake of the Emancipation Proclamation - and Douglass got deeply involved personally in recruiting members of the 54th Massachusetts Regiment. Two of his own sons were members of that regiment.

He slowly but surely changes his tune about Lincoln. He comes to see the war now as a crusade led by Lincoln and the Republicans to not only save the Union but do it by destroying slavery. He would - everywhere he got a chance to say it, he would say freedom to the slave is freedom to the nation. Freedom to the slave is the preservation of the Union.

DAVIES: You know, when he was a young abolitionist, Frederick Douglass, like William Lloyd Garrison, didn't think the U.S. Constitution could be used to grant true equality. He came to regard it differently and saw the Civil War as a chance for, in a way, a second American revolution. And of course the question was whether the slaves in the South would truly be given the rights of citizenship. And in 1866, he leads a delegation of blacks to meet with Andrew Johnson, who was the - who had become president after Lincoln's assassination, himself essentially a white supremacist. What happens at this meeting?

BLIGHT: It's an extraordinary meeting, and it's a debacle. Douglass leads his delegation February 1866 of about 12 black men to the White House to meet with Johnson to talk to him about black civil and political rights 'cause at that point, the nature of the reconstruction laws and the soon-to-be 14th Amendment was all up in the air. The debates were just beginning to happen in Congress, and there was Andrew Johnson, seemingly standing in the way of it all. And did he ever. They had a bitter and terrible exchange that lasted almost an hour.

Andrew Johnson gave a speech to this delegation that Douglass led, a bitter speech. He blamed black people for the war. He told them they should really colonize themselves outside of the country; they should really leave, that political rights, especially the right to vote, was just never really going to be possible. And when Douglass tried at times to interrupt or interject, Johnson would tell him to be quiet and just listen. And they were forced basically to listen.

Douglass finally toward the end of this meeting got in a few lines and a few questions. He demanded the right to vote. He said the right to vote for black people is ultimate peace and freedom to the whole country. But as they were leaving, Andrew Johnson was overheard saying - and it was recorded even in the newspaper - that Douglass - he's just like every other N-word I've ever known; he'll as soon cut your throat as anything. And Douglass overheard that. This is the president of the United States.

Douglass then went back, and with his older son Lewis who was at this meeting, they wrote a kind of a manifesto letter that was published denouncing Andrew Johnson and protesting. But most importantly, Douglass did what he always did. He went to his desk, and he wrote a barnburner of a speech. He called it "The Perils To The Republic." It was like - it was a speech of warning, you know, that Andrew Johnson stands in the way here of the fruition of the victories of the Civil War.

And he took that speech on the road in the summer of 1866. He's still giving it in 1867. And it has so many modern echoes today, especially the line where he says, it is all well and good. Our Constitution and our laws are all well and good when a good man is president, but what do we do with our laws and our Constitution when a bad man is president? He was of course referring to Andrew Johnson.

But this is - what's fascinating about that encounter is that it's at this moment of revolutionary change, and all things seemed possible about reconstruction in the South and in the constitution if it can be enacted, if it can be done over the veto power of the president. But it's quite an encounter, and there's really never been another meeting quite as bad (laughter) between any other president and a delegation of black leaders.

GROSS: We're listening to the interview FRESH AIR's Dave Davies recorded with David Blight, author of the new book "Frederick Douglass: Prophet Of Freedom." We'll hear more of the interview after a break. And our critic-at-large John Powers will present his Ghost List, his list of books, movies and TV shows he wishes he'd reviewed this year but didn't. I'm Terry Gross, and this is FRESH AIR.

(SOUNDBITE OF ELVIN JONES' "ANTHROPOLOGY")

GROSS: This is FRESH AIR. I'm Terry Gross. Let's get back to the interview FRESH AIR's Dave Davies recorded with the Yale historian David Blight. He's written a new biography of Frederick Douglass, the 19th century abolitionist who escaped from slavery and became a nationally celebrated writer and orator. The book, called "Frederick Douglass: Prophet Of Freedom," details many interesting facets of Douglass' experience, including his alliance with and eventual break from women's suffragists, his loyalty to an increasingly conservative Republican Party and his complicated personal life.

DAVIES: After Douglass' wife Anna died, he ended up marrying a white woman, Helen Pitts, 20 years younger. How was that regarded? What complications did that present to a black man of the 19th century being married to a younger white woman?

BLIGHT: Yes, Douglass' marriage to Helen Pitts in 1884 was the most scandalous marriage of the 19th century. I'm not even sure what you could compare it to. Most famous black man in the country married a white woman 20 years younger. Helen was 46. He was 66. She grew up in western New York in a staunchly antislavery family. And during the war, she worked in a contraband camp for refugee slaves just outside of Washington D.C. heroically. She even caught malaria and had to go home. So she had these abolitionist credentials and roots. She was very well educated. She graduated from Mount Holyoke College. She came to Washington to get a job, and Douglass hired her in the Recorder of Deeds office, which was one of his federal appointments.

Among his eight clerks were his three sons, his daughter, Rosetta, and Helen Pitts. Helen and Rosetta were almost the same age. And on a day in February of 1884, about a year and a half after Anna had died, one day a reporter walked into the office and said to Rosetta, do you realize your father just bought a marriage license down the hall here in City Hall? And Rosetta said no (laughter). And the point is that they did it in complete secrecy, apparently deciding to take the flak after the fact rather than before. But did they ever take the flak for months on end.

The white press, the black press mostly against the marriage - although he had many supporters as well - attacked him. He was attacked for being disloyal to the race, for marrying such a young woman. One of the craziest things that happens in the press with that is how so many articles would make him even older and her even younger. By the time it got over, Helen was 32 and Douglass was 79 or something.

DAVIES: (Laughter).

BLIGHT: It got ridiculous after a while. But he handled it with grace, and so did she. And by all accounts, the last 11 years of his life was a happy marriage. They were great companions. And they even made an extraordinary tour of Europe and the Mediterranean together in 1886 and '87.

DAVIES: Frederick Douglass is known as a real champion of women's suffrage. I think he was the only male speaker at the Seneca Falls meeting in 1848, right?

BLIGHT: Yes. He's the only male speaker. He wasn't the only male signer of the Declaration of Sentiments at Seneca Falls, but he was the only black person even attending it. He embraced women's suffrage early and often.

DAVIES: And...

BLIGHT: Except he got into a big problem later (laughter).

DAVIES: Well, that's what I wanted to get to.

BLIGHT: All right.

DAVIES: He befriended Elizabeth Cady Stanton. And in the end, they had a falling-out. It was over principle. What happened?

BLIGHT: Well, there were competing principles of course. When it came time for the 15th Amendment, the Voting Rights Amendment that passed in 1869, Douglass had a terrible falling-out with Susan Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who were the - and others, but they were the two great leaders of the women's suffrage movement.

And the whole debate was essentially about whether women would be included in the Voting Rights Amendment. And they were not. And the reason of course was that everyone with one eye open knew that if you put women's suffrage into that amendment, it never would have passed first the Congress, and certainly wouldn't have passed in the state legislatures. So Douglass took the position that, as he put it, it was the black man's hour. And this was the one chance to get the right to vote for black men, and that for now women would have to once again wait.

Well, Stanton and Anthony were - had run out of patience. They weren't going to wait any longer. But the problem was they pushed back and fought back with racist language, terribly racist language against Douglass and against black men generally. And Douglass handled most of that as a gentleman with grace, except he also threw about some rather stereotypical claims.

For example, he said, well, educated women can still have their husbands voting, and their husbands can vote their interest, which rings pretty badly on our ears today. But it was one of those moments when you had to make choices, and he took the choice of favoring the 15th Amendment because it got at least black male suffrage into the Constitution.

DAVIES: You know, he became committed to the Republican Party. And one of the most interesting things I think about the last half of your book is we see Frederick Douglass become a political insider. I mean, this guy who was a radical outsider, he gets patronage jobs. And the interesting thing is that as he embraces the Republican Party in the last half of the 19th century, it is a party that has essentially abandoned, you know...

BLIGHT: Yes.

DAVIES: ...The effort to grant blacks real citizenship in the South. It is becoming increasingly the party of big business. You know, it's tariffs. It's free trade. It's anti-labor unions.

BLIGHT: Right. Right.

DAVIES: Does he go with all of that?

BLIGHT: He goes along with it. He never gives up on the Republican Party. It can seem like a difficult thing to explain, but his usual explanation was he had nowhere else to go politically. He used to say, you know, the Republican Party is the ship, and all else is the sea. There was no other political home for blacks.

The problem was the Republican Party, as you say, moves away from enforcement of the Reconstruction Act, moves away from the Southern problem, moves away from enforcement of black voting rights and civil rights and even moves away from enforcement against terrorist groups, for God's sake. It's a difficult thing for him. And he does levy some pretty brutal criticisms of the Republican Party over time, but it's from within the party. He campaigned for every Republican presidential candidate from 1864, Lincoln's re-election, to the end of his days. His last presidential was 1892. He always campaigned for the Republican candidate.

He always said it's still the party of emancipation. It is still the party that saved the Union and it must somehow find its way back to its creeds even when it was pretty clear it was not. And this was, as I said, one of the disputes he has with a new generation of black leadership, who is asking, should they remain loyal to a party that no longer really speaks for their interests? And he had to now say this from a position of being inside that party within Washington. And he himself got accused of a good deal of hypocrisy.

DAVIES: David Blight's biography of Frederick Douglass is called "Prophet Of Freedom." We'll continue our conversation in just a moment. This is FRESH AIR.

(SOUNDBITE OF TED NASH'S "THE FOUR FREEDOMS (FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT)")

DAVIES: This is FRESH AIR, and we're speaking with David Blight. He's a professor of history at Yale University. He has a new biography of Frederick Douglass called "Prophet Of Freedom."

As he gets older, he still has this huge extended family to support. And he continues to write and travel and speak.

BLIGHT: Yes.

DAVIES: He does polemicize strongly against what's happening in the South where blacks are denied civil rights and lynchings arise.

BLIGHT: Right.

DAVIES: And it's interesting that, in a lot of these writings, he speaks about the sexual cruelty of slavery - you know, masters raping, you know...

BLIGHT: Yeah.

DAVIES: ...Their slaves and also lynching...

BLIGHT: Yeah.

DAVIES: ...In the South being driven by this obsessive fear that black men...

BLIGHT: Yeah.

DAVIES: ...May rape white women.

BLIGHT: Yeah, yeah.

DAVIES: And I wonder if you think his willingness to write about this was in some way connected to the fact that his own birth was perhaps the result of a rape...

BLIGHT: Yeah.

DAVIES: ...Of his mother by a white master.

BLIGHT: Well, I don't doubt that for a minute. It's difficult, you know, to play psychologist in retrospect and say here is where he's saying that or showing that. But I don't think there's any doubt about that. He always knew that he's the product of a union of a white man against his own mother. His father was his master or one of his masters. He was owned by, actually, three different people. But to his dying day, he never could quite figure out - and he tried very hard to figure out his paternity. And if, indeed, it had been Aaron Anthony, by the way, his first owner - Aaron Anthony was 55 years old when Douglass was born, and his mother was about 24. So you can add that to the picture, too. So yeah. He knows he's a product of this huge phenomenon. But yes, it is rooted in his own sense of his own identity and his own unresolved identity.

DAVIES: In 1877, after this - well, in the later years of a very long and distinguished career, at which he is a very well-known and respected orator and writer, he goes to Maryland and tracks down his former master Thomas Auld.

BLIGHT: Right.

DAVIES: What do we know of this meeting?

BLIGHT: It's an amazing meeting. Thomas Auld, Douglass believed, was on his deathbed. He turned out not to die for roughly another year, but he went back to St. Michael's on the Eastern Shore - the very town in which Auld had held him as a teenage slave and beaten him, by the way, and then rented him out to other, you know, slaveholders at times as a field hand. But he went back. He met Auld with great publicity. He had press in tow. We have numerous, you know, press reports of this, which is how we know a fair amount about it. And he went to Auld's bed, and they met for about 20 or 25 minutes.

Douglass tells us they both shed tears. It was a - kind of a meeting of epics and eras. By then, Auld, of course, knew how famous Douglass was. But Douglass quite directly appears to have asked Auld, are you my father? Or in some way he asked him. Douglass says he asked even if Auld could tell him his birthday. And Auld apparently said he thought it was February of 1818, which it is. Douglass had never known. Douglass actually thought he was born in 1817 (laughter). He's trying to find out his birth, his paternity, his roots and so on. But Auld did not say, yes, I'm your father. Maybe he couldn't. I don't know. My own guess is that Auld is probably not his father, but that's a pure guess - educated guess, I guess (laughter).

DAVIES: And did they talk about their relationship of ownership and bondage?

BLIGHT: They did. And to some degree, according to Douglass who is our - he's his own eyewitness for this, you have to remember. Yeah, they did. And I think Douglass also brought up the fact that he had befriended Auld's children, his daughter and son, just to try to understand, probably, whether they were actually kin. But even more importantly on that visit, Douglass went over to Easton, Md., where he gave an incredible speech in an old black church.

And then he went out to the Tuckahoe River to the horseshoe bend on a cold November day, dug his hands down in the soil where he believed his grandmother Betsy's cabin would have stood. He remembered a particular tree - dug his hands into the soil, put some handfuls into a bag. And he took back some of the soil of where he was born. I don't know what ever happened to those bags, but he took them back to Washington with him as though he was, once again, trying to dig up his roots literally - trying to see if he could understand where, in his imagination, he could find his mother in that soil, where he could find his grandmother in that soil, how he could even understand who he was.

And most importantly, he was always trying to understand, how could a slave boy from that spot become who he became? How could a kid as a slave from that side of the Chesapeake cross the Chesapeake and become this world-class orator, writer and thinker and even statesman? He was always trying to even grasp and understand his own story as he kept telling it.

DAVIES: In a speech in 1875, he got a lot of attention when he seemed to sort of condemn some charitable efforts aimed at blacks and kind of embraced the idea of black self-reliance. And this is something...

BLIGHT: That's right.

DAVIES: ...Which causes modern day conservatives and even libertarians to claim him as one of their own.

BLIGHT: Yes.

DAVIES: What was his view?

BLIGHT: Well, he early and often favored self-reliance for his fellow black people. Virtually all black leaders in the 19th century preached a kind of self-reliance. What else could they do in a society that either enslaved them, segregated them, defined them out of the Constitution and later on, of course, even used terror to eliminate them? So self-reliance was a matter of inevitable necessity in some ways.

But what modern conservatives, as you said, especially the libertarians, have done is they've plucked out a speech from 1875 - but many others, too, before that and after that - where Douglass would answer the question, what does a Negro want, which was always bandied about. And his answer would be, let them alone; leave them alone; let them alone.

And he would say, give him fair play, which meant enforce the law; enforce his or her rights; don't kill them when they're trying to vote and so forth. But what modern conservatives have done is they plucked out pieces of rhetoric here and there. And they've said, aha, you see, Douglass was not only a Republican, but he believed in individualism and self-reliance and self-help, which meant he didn't advocate for government assistance and so forth.

I have to say it's a terrible misuse and appropriation of Douglass because it ignores, I would argue, 80 or 90 percent of the rest of his ideas and the rest of his life. He was not antigovernment in the least. He believed in activist, interventionist use of federal power to destroy slavery, to destroy the Confederacy and to reconceive the U.S. Constitution. But it's what we do with historical figures, you know?

There used to be this saying, you know, about people getting right with Lincoln, always trying to get Lincoln on their side. Well, a lot of that goes on now with Douglass as well. If you can get the most famous and important black thinker and writer of the 19th century somehow arguing your case for you, it might have some currency in the present. But it's often a rather slippery misuse of the past. He did preach self-reliance. There's no question about that. But you have to go back into that context to understand why.

DAVIES: David Blight, thanks so much for speaking with us.

BLIGHT: My pleasure. Thanks for having me, Dave.

GROSS: David Blight's new book is "Frederick Douglass: Prophet Of Freedom." He spoke with FRESH AIR's Dave Davies. Coming up, our critic-at-large John Powers presents his annual ghost list, his list of the year's books, movies and TV shows that he loved but didn't get a chance to review. This is FRESH AIR.

(SOUNDBITE OF BOOKER T. & THE MG'S' "SANTA CLAUS IS COMING TO TOWN")

TERRY GROSS, HOST:

This is FRESH AIR. It's that time of year when our critics make lists of the best things they've watched, read or listened to over the year. Our critic-at-large John Powers has a different kind of annual list, one he calls his ghost list, the things he wishes he'd reviewed but didn't.

JOHN POWERS, BYLINE: It's often said that we regret the things we don't do even more than the ones we do. Each December, I'm haunted by all the books, movies and TV shows that I've loved but haven't managed to get on the air. Wailing in my ear and rattling my screensaver, these neglected spirits come together to demand their place in what I call my annual ghost list.

This year's list starts with the partly animated comedy "Paddington 2," the latest adventures of the polite, infinitely trusting Peruvian bear who lives in London. This time out, Paddington runs afoul of a scheming ham actor, played with hilarious Oscar-worthy glee by Hugh Grant, who frames him for a crime. Directed by Paul King, the movie is a gift basket of inventive scenes, glorious production design and immaculately timed jokes, all in the service of something touchingly rare in today's movies - a celebration of decency, kindness and faith.

The world's a far less forgiving place in "Heads Of The Colored People," a mischievously witty and perceptive collection of stories by Nafissa Thompson-Spires, who offers a keen look at upper-middle-class African-Americans who live and work in predominantly white spaces. Yet she does so obliquely, through a girl worried about sweating too much at school or two moms with doctorates exchanging savage one-upping letters about their daughters or anthropology students bickering about the stereotypes in an ethnography report about the bread eaten by Southern blacks. Thompson-Spires can be laugh-out-loud funny. But as in the brilliant title story, her work carries a kick of sadness. It comes from her awareness that writing truthfully about African-American life means you can't wholly escape writing about lives being cut down in their prime.

Life should be much cushier for the ultra-rich characters on HBO's "Succession," a pop version of "King Lear" in which a Rupert Murdoch-style media baron, Logan Roy, battles with his four grown children for control of the family's empire. It has everything you'd want in a high-class potboiler - scheming, backbiting, Oedipal rage, illicit sex, poisonous putdowns, startling betrayals, superb acting and a story that builds to a brilliant, slyly sinister Season 1 finale. You get a brief flavor of the show in this scene when Roy, commandingly played by Brian Cox, surprises his kids with a bullying new request.

(SOUNDBITE OF TV SHOW, "SUCCESSION")

JEREMY STRONG: (As Kendall Roy) Dad?

BRIAN COX: (As Logan Roy) Yes?

KIERAN CULKIN: (As Roman Roy) Yeah, what's the deal?

COX: (As Logan Roy) So on the family trust, which will decide the situation in the event of my unlikely demise, I'm going to add Marcy to myself and you four.

SARAH SNOOK: (As Siobhan Roy) Whoa, OK.

COX: (As Logan Roy) And my seat also to go to her on my death.

SNOOK: (As Siobhan Roy) What? Wait; that gives her double voting weight.

COX: (As Logan Roy) Uh-huh. So I've got some paperwork...

STRONG: (As Kendall Roy) Whoa, whoa, whoa. What, so Marcia will have two votes when you...

CULKIN: (As Roman Roy) If he.

STRONG: (As Kendall Roy) Well, no, Rome, it's not an if.

CULKIN: (As Roman Roy) Well, excuse me if I don't want him to...

STRONG: (As Kendall Roy) Well, it's not really what we want in this case, Rome.

POWERS: Filled with scenes like this one, "Succession" is enough to make you glad you're not rich and powerful - well, almost. Then again, it's probably worse to be one of the royals. Consider the case of Queen Elizabeth's stylish but frustrated younger sister, Princess Margaret, probably the best character on the terrific TV series "The Crown."

Her story gets told in Craig Brown's "99 Glimpses Of Princess Margaret," the most enjoyable biography I've ever read. Ignoring the dull stuff, Brown looks at Margaret's literally entitled life from 99 different angles, from her marriage to a husband who gaslighted her to her hobnobbing with the likes of Peter Sellers and Mick Jagger to her constant, legendarily breathtaking rudeness. She once flicked cigarette ash into a passing man's open hand.

Even as Brown merrily chronicles her awfulness, he's not without sympathy for Margaret, who emerges as a thwarted soul surrounded by rich and famous people who fawn in her presence and trash her in private. Every single page of this book contains something interesting. Who knew that our familiar horoscope with its 12 signs had its origins in Margaret's birth?

The aristocracy is no better in "Happy As Lazzaro," the beautiful new film from Italian director Alice Rohrwacher who offers a mysterious blend of folktale and politicized realism. Set on a tobacco-growing estate worked by sharecroppers, the movie takes its name from its hero, a saintly Paddington-like young fellow named Lazzaro. He's befriended by a young marquis who asks him to help fake his own kidnapping.

From there, Lazzaro's story takes off in a wholly unexpected direction, one that makes you ask whether today's urban poor are any better off than feudal peasants. But Rorhwacher is too gifted a filmmaker to give this question an easy, PC answer. Instead, "Happy As Lazzaro," which is streamable on Netflix, taps into a mythic wellspring of stories more ancient than Italy itself.

Mythology is only one facet of the work of Ingmar Bergman, the Swedish filmmaker born 100 years ago this past July. Until the late 1970s, Bergman was widely reckoned the gold standard for what were known as art films. But over the last 40 years, it's become routine to call him overrated, hokily symbolic, embarrassingly theatrical, obsessed with a spiritual angst that has grown passe.

But the pendulum swung too far against him. For proof, you need merely look at Criterion's fabulous new box set "Ingmar Bergman's Cinema," a collector's must-have that brings together nearly 40 of his films on Blu-ray. Watching them, you see a driven artist who made great magnificently acted films in vastly different styles, from the bleak realism of "Summer With Monika" to the Shakespearean comedy of "Smiles Of The Summer Night" (ph) to the avant-garde splintering of "Persona" to the searing psychodrama of "Scenes From A Marriage."

Because Bergman was constantly involved with his leading ladies, often to their cost, no modern filmmaker spent more time exploring the endlessly complicated relationship between men and women. Intimacy was Bergman's theme and his genius. In this intimate time of year when everyone gets together, I hope you'll take pleasure in his ghostly company and the company of his companions on this list.

GROSS: John Powers writes about TV and film for Vogue and vogue.com. Tomorrow on FRESH AIR, my guest will be Emily Blunt. She stars as Mary Poppins in the new film "Mary Poppins Returns." It has new songs and a new story. Blunt also costarred in "The Devil Wears Prada," "The Girl On The Train," "A Quiet Place" and the film adaptation of the Stephen Sondheim musical "Into The Woods." We'll close with Emily Blunt singing a song from the soundtrack of "Mary Poppins Returns."

(SOUNDBITE OF SONG, "CAN YOU IMAGINE THAT?")

EMILY BLUNT: (As Mary Poppins, singing) Some people like to splash and play - can you imagine that? - and take a seaside holiday. Can you imagine that? Too much glee leaves rings around the brain. Take that joy and send it down the drain. Some people like to laugh at life and giggle through the day. They think the world's a brand-new shiny toy. And if, while dreaming in the clouds, they fall and go kasplat (ph), although they're down and bent in half they brush right off and start to laugh. Can you imagine that?

On second thoughts, perhaps you're right. It makes no sense to take a bath this early.

JOEL DAWSON: (As Georgie Banks) Wait; I want to take a bath.

BLUNT: (As Mary Poppins) Oh, really? Up you go, and in you go.

DAWSON: (As Georgie Banks) Whoa.

NATHANAEL SALEH: (As John Banks) Georgie - what happened?

PIXIE DAVIES: (As Anabel Banks) Will they be all right?

BLUNT: (As Mary Poppins) Well, it is just a bath after all. But then again, it's not my tub.

DAVIES: (As Anabel Banks) Shouldn't you go in after them?

BLUNT: (As Mary Poppins) Oh, no. I had my bath this morning, thank you.

SALEH: (As John Banks) Well, if you won't, I will. Whoa.

BLUNT: (As Mary Poppins) Off we go.

GROSS: FRESH AIR's executive producer is Danny Miller. Our engineer today is Adam Staniszewski. Our associate producer of digital media is Molly Seavy-Nesper. Roberta Shorrock directs the show. I'm Terry Gross.

(SOUNDBITE OF MUSIC)

Transcripts are created on a rush deadline, and accuracy and availability may vary. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Please be aware that the authoritative record of Fresh Air interviews and reviews are the audio recordings of each segment.